Is it expensive to lingerie proofing fee?
How do you say to hear underwear manufacturers
Underwear for processing factory usually goes through proofing, confirm sample, this is mainly for bulk production.
Proofing usually underwear manufacturers will want to put certain proofing fee?
Should the proofing fee underwear manufacturers, the yield is expensive or not?
How do you say listen underwear manufacturers.
Customer underwear via the Internet to find processing factory, usually more concerned about the proofing fee, underwear manufacturers once quoted proofing fee, many people will be surprised, so expensive!
It is mainly you might not understand underwear proofing need how many working procedure, what is the cost?
First of all, we should talk about lingerie proofing fee charge?
About the lingerie proofing fee in yiwu shirtwaist eserkafel knitting, usually charge is one of 500 yuan, the 500 yuan if carefully spread down a underwear proofing cost is far from enough.
Lingerie especially seamless underwear is not controllable, many factors can only with experience try again and again, a lot of samples to a customer, underwear manufacturers are experimenting on seven or eight to ten times with customers very close to the samples.
For seamless underwear material is protean, most of the time, the customer also don't know he got the sample material composition proportion, underwear factory close to do with the customer's samples, can only rely on their own experience to test again.
Actually had to underwear factory visit will know, a lingerie sample proofing from design to make light to dozens of working procedure, may need several days to complete.
To tell the truth sometimes play a lingerie, designer's wage is not enough light, underwear factory many times or at a loss.
But the proofing is underwear reached cooperation between manufacturers and customers a way of risk minimum.
We eserkafel knitting usually pull charges 500 yuan for the customer, the 500 yuan is just a barrier, a cornerstone of cooperation and trust each other, truly you big goods production in the future, we will return this charge as a payment to you.
Our underwear manufacturers do not expect through the proofing fee to earn any money.
If you just proofing, later have no bulk orders, underwear manufacturers relative loss less, this is also a way of a win-win situation of mutual trust.
If you blindly would proofing fee, which underwear manufacturers lower fees, what of, have no meaning, it is not about money, the in the mind all know each other.
Many clients also entangled with lingerie proofing fee is expensive or not, some underwear factory is 300 yuan, your house is 500 yuan?
Eserkafel knitting also say very understand about it, we don't count on the customer what make money 500 yuan, do you have a real big goods production, the cost is returned to you.
We eserkafel knitting about lingerie proofing fee is usually more flexible.
For example you are our old customer, we cooperated with many times, each other is also very happy, occasionally play a few sample no charge is also very normal.
Actually lingerie proofing there is another very important reason, is that the cost of nuclear offer.
Many clients through the network to find underwear manufacturers, will require quotation, underwear manufacturers in order to give you a accurate quotation will also ask you to pull, only through proofing, after each process a baseline can we accounting out accurate price.
About the lingerie should proofing fee, is expensive or not.
Eserkafel knitting thinks the accept, and we must accept.
To the market, give each other a fair environment, no rules difficult bluewind!
More about ladies underwear, seamless underwear information please call our eserkafel knitting underwear manufacturer: + 86 18807953905 WhatsApp/Skype: + 86 18807953905 consultation!
Yiwu eserkafel knitting & other;
Jinhua famous brand!
Tel: + 86 18807953905 whatsapp/Skype: + 86 18807953905 email/E -
Editor: eserkafel knitting electronic commerce & ndash;
D save feed all rights reserved,
Yiwu eserkafel knitting)
Reprint please indicate the source